data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42923/42923515327e13d5533b4da622110cab021c8a75" alt=""
The Huntington paid 192,500 British pounds -- roughly $385,000 -- for the sculpture by the American artist Harriet Hosmer (1830-1908). Considered Hosmer's masterpiece, the statue resurfaced at Sotheby's in London in November after being rediscovered in a private collection more than a century after it had been last seen in public.In contrast to typical mid-19th century classical sculptures of captive women - naked, in shackles, and with downcast eyes (as, for example, Hiram Powers' titillating Greek Slave) - Zenobia is "dignified, fully dressed and holding the chains in her hands, as if she has ownership over her captivity."
It was a bold statement for any woman artist of the time to make. While many Neoclassical artists depicted mythological figures, Hosmer was chiefly drawn to female characters whose stories could be viewed as allegories for her strongly held feminist beliefs:
"I honor every woman who has strength enough to step out of the beaten path when she feels that her walk lies in another."Zenobia, for example, can easily be read in relation to the condition of 19th-century women, who were placed on a pedestal but simultaneously enslaved by harsh financial constraints that bound them to men.
When she produced the towering Zenobia in 1859, the work was met with disbelief that a woman created it. “Zenobia is one of the most famous — and controversial — objects produced during the ‘golden age’ of American classical sculpture," says John Murdoch, Director of the Huntington Art Collections. "Some critics at the time questioned whether a work of such sublime expression, on such a scale, and requiring such power of hand and arm in the carving could have been done by a woman."
But what a woman!
The official versiondata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62331/62331fec18dc97305b927436d541e7e198ad1d67" alt=""
The real low-down
Hosmer never had any patience for the strict rules of decorum that regulated behaviour among young ladies in the polite circles of her day.
Here was a woman who , at the very outset of her life, refused to have her feet cramped by the little Chinese shoes which society places on us all and then misnames our feeble tottering, feminine grace.*Instead, she was driven to work long hours in the studio, perfecting her art. While still living in Boston, her early sculpture caught the eye of Charlotte Cushman, one of the most famous American actresses of her day. Cushman -- whose performances impressed such luminaries as Walt Whitman ("the most intense acting ever felt on the Parks [Theatre] boards") -- was particularly admired for playing men's parts, a popular practice in the nineteenth-century theatre. Male attire, including tight breeches, displayed more of the woman's body to the audience than did the flowing gowns of female costumes; hence, the so-called 'breeches parts' appealed to male spectators -- and women, too. Throughout her career, Cushman received many fan letters from women who had been moved by the sight of the actress when she was playing a man making love to a woman.
Hosmer was moved, literally.
Cushman was preparing to retire from the stage and live in Rome. She took young Hosmer with her. The artist entered Cushman's inner circle, one of her household of 'jolly bachelor women'. At the time, Cushman was living with Matilda Hays, a novelist, journalist, and translator of the works of George Sand. There was no doubt about their relationship: Elizabeth Barrett Browning noted, "I understand that [Cushman] and Miss Hays have made vows of celibacy and of eternal attachment to each other -- they live together, dress alike, . . . it is a female marriage."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f71ed/f71ed4b56090ab6d426fd0092e2a5c45af0a9687" alt=""
In 1858, Nathaniel Hawthorne and his wife visited Hosmer at her studio in Rome, and the writer gave a telling description of her: “She had on a male shirt, collar, and cravat…. She was indeed very queer….”
I think we can take that as read.
After the Civil War, the shift in American taste away from neoclassical art made it more difficult for Hosmer to make a living as a sculptor. That may have been why she was dabbling with perpetual motion machines. By the time she died in 1908 at least one obituary expressed surprise that she was still alive. She left behind $ 2,500 in debts.
Make it up to her, Huntington!
Will not -- shall not -- every American look with pride -- an honest, noble pride -- on this marble effigy of Zenobia, because it is the ideal, the production, of an American, and that American a woman.**
* Quoted from the American writer Lydia Maria Child, one of Hosmer's devoted friends.
** Anonymous author, The Saturday Evening Gazette, March 26, 1865, Harriet Hosmer Papers, Watertown Public Library, Watertown, MA.
The photograph of Harriet Hosmer on ladder with her sculpture of Thomas Hart Benton (1782-1858), c.1860, is from the Bridgeman Art Library.
Hola Judith! What a great post! I'm going to link it to Chess, Goddess and Everything blog asap (but probably not tonight, I'm pooped!)
ReplyDeleteI've got the piece ready I promised you many months ago about chess and Persia - how do I get it to you? You can email me at jlnatty@yahoo.com
Bravo! I've been contributing to the wikipedia article on Harriet Hosmer and have recently made some corrections regarding where her Zenobia (the original) was located. I had to settle on noting the location of a major copy only. Thanks to your blog I am now able to cite the location of the original as the Huntington.
ReplyDeleteBravo!
Web design
ReplyDeletevery handy, thanx a lot for this artficle ....... Thisa is exactgly what I was looking for.
I don’t ordinarily comment but I gotta admit thankyou for the post on this great one : D.
ReplyDelete